Odd Object Lifting
Lift
What Are Odd Objects?
Odd objects are exactly what they sound like: things that aren’t shaped like a barbell.
Common odd objects:
- Atlas stones: round concrete or steel stones, lifted from ground to shoulder or platform
- Sandbags: duffel-shaped bags, heaved and carried
- Kegs: beer kegs filled with water or sand
- Tires: tractor tires, flipped end-over-end
- Anvils, logs, and other implements
Why athletes use them:
- Real life isn’t symmetrical — people, opponents, and objects are awkward
- Trains the body to handle unstable loads
- Builds grip, core, and full-body coordination in ways barbells can’t
- Highly transferable to combat sports, tactical professions, and any sport with contact
The core idea: a barbell is polite. It sits balanced on your shoulders. An odd object doesn’t cooperate. Training with them makes you stronger in ways the barbell can’t.
Most strongman events use odd objects, and they’re the single best way to prepare for real-world unpredictability.
What is the main reason athletes train with odd objects?
How to Lift Odd Objects
Each odd object has its own technique. Here are the four main categories.
1. Atlas Stones
- Stand with feet wider than the stone, toes out
- down, wrap arms around the stone (hug it close)
- Drive with legs, not back
- Roll the stone up your torso to your chest
- Use a lap-and-load technique: place on lap, re-grip, stand
- Push the stone onto the platform or over your shoulder
2. Sandbags
- Grip the handles (or squeeze the fabric)
- Hinge down, lift with legs
- Bear hug close to body
- For shoulder carry: heavy hip thrust up and catch on one shoulder
- For carries: hold on shoulder, chest, or in front rack
3. Kegs
- Two main grips: bear hug (chest) or overhead press
- For chest carry: hug to chest, core, walk
- For overhead: clean to chest, press or push-jerk overhead
- For keg toss: swing back and launch forward
4. Tire Flips
- Squat down, hands under the tread
- Chest against the tire, drive with legs and hips
- Use a hip-drive motion (like a power clean)
- Push the tire over, don’t pull it
- Reset each rep
Primary Points of Performance:
- Lift with legs, not back
- Keep objects close to your center of mass
- Brace core hard before each lift
- Reset position between reps
- Breathe before the lift, not during
Common Faults:
| Fault | Fix |
|---|---|
| Rounding the back | Hinge at hips, chest up |
| Trying to muscle it | Use legs, generate hip extension |
| Object drifting away from body | Hug tighter, pull close |
| No reset between reps | Take 2-3 sec between reps to reset |
| Poor grip on stones | Chalk, forearm strength, tacky (competition) |
What is the 'lap-and-load' technique for Atlas stones?
The Biomechanics of Odd Object Lifting
Odd object lifting is fundamentally different from barbell training. The instability, asymmetry, and shape variety produce a distinct adaptation profile.
Why instability matters:
- Barbell lifts load the body symmetrically along a fixed path
- Odd objects load the body asymmetrically with unpredictable weight distribution
- This forces constant micro-corrections from the core, hips, and shoulders
- The result: more total muscle activation per unit load than equivalent barbell work
Force-velocity-load profile:
Unlike a barbell, odd objects don’t have standardized loading:
- Atlas stones: heavy, awkward, lap-and-load
- Sandbags: moderate load, unstable, variable grip
- Kegs: moderate-heavy, dynamic, toss options
- Tires: moderate-heavy, hip-dominant, high power
The athlete must adapt technique to the object, not the other way around.
Muscle activation patterns:
Studies show odd object lifting produces higher:
- Core activation (obliques, deep stabilizers) — up to 40% higher than equivalent barbell work
- Grip demands — near maximal throughout the lift
- Full-body coordination — the movement can’t be isolated
Grip specificity:
Odd objects are typically harder to grip than a barbell:
- Stones have no handles — need to grip the surface (tacky in competition)
- Sandbags sag and shift
- Kegs slip when wet or sweaty
- Tires require under-tread grip
This is why grip training (farmer carries, plate pinches, dead hangs) supports odd object performance.
Programming implications:
- Train odd objects 1-2x per week
- Lower than barbell work — technique and grip fatigue fast
- Combine with farmer carries and sled work for full strongman prep
- Rest 2-3 min between heavy sets
- Use chalk liberally
- Reset fully between reps — sloppy reps don’t build strength
Testing benchmarks:
| Event | Beginner | Intermediate | Advanced |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atlas stone load (to 48” platform) | 60% BW | 100% BW | 140% BW |
| Sandbag carry (shoulder) | 25% BW x 20m | 50% BW x 20m | 75% BW x 20m |
| Keg clean & press | 30% BW | 50% BW | 70% BW |
| Tire flip (medium tire, 300-500 lb) | 3 flips | 6 flips | 10 flips |
Why do odd object lifts produce higher core activation than equivalent barbell work?
Advanced Odd Object Science
At the research level, odd object training is studied as a bridge between traditional strength training and real-world physical capacity — with specific transfer to unpredictable loads and combat/occupational tasks.
Transfer to real-world tasks:
Barbells train maximal force production in a fixed pattern. Odd objects train:
- Force production with variable load distribution
- Grip endurance under unpredictable conditions
- Core against asymmetric forces
- Coordination between grip, trunk, and legs
This is why tactical athletes (military, fire, police) use odd objects extensively.
Transfer to sport:
| Sport | Odd Object Transfer |
|---|---|
| Wrestling / grappling | High — body-to-body contact demands instability handling |
| Football (line play) | High — pushing, pulling, wrestling-like demands |
| Rugby | High — similar to wrestling plus carrying |
| MMA | Moderate-high — grip, takedowns, throws |
| Basketball | Moderate — rebounding, post play |
| Sprinting | Low-moderate — odd objects are slow |
The “functional” caveat:
“Functional training” is an overused term, but odd objects genuinely justify it — they train coordination under load with unpredictable constraints. The transfer to real-world strength (throwing, catching, carrying, resisting) is direct.
Advanced programming models:
1. Strongman medley (competition prep):
- 4-6 events, 30-60 sec each, 2-3 min transitions
- Total session: 60-90 min
- 1x per week
2. Odd object + barbell combo:
- Heavy barbell lift (squat, deadlift) then odd object (stone load, tire flip)
- 3-4 sets of each
- 2x per week
3. Odd object conditioning:
- 5 rounds: stone load, sandbag carry 20m, tire flip 3x
- 2-3 min rest between rounds
- 1x per week
4. Tactical / GPP focus:
- Mixed modality: carries, sled, odd objects, bodyweight
- Continuous work for 20-30 min
- 1-2x per week
Safety considerations:
Odd objects have higher injury risk than barbells:
- Load distribution is unpredictable — a slip can overload a joint
- Grip failure means sudden drops
- Spine loading during stone loads is extreme
- Tire flips require excellent hip hinging
Mitigation:
- Use correct technique every rep
- Warm up thoroughly
- Build up loads gradually
- Use chalk or tacky
- Use a belt for stone loads above 80% of bodyweight
- Stop if any joint feels compromised
Testing and benchmarking for advanced athletes:
| Event | Elite Standard |
|---|---|
| Stone load (heavyweight, 48”) | 160-200+ kg |
| Sandbag carry (heavyweight, 20m) | 100-130 kg |
| Tire flip (1000+ lb tire) | 8-12 flips |
| Keg toss (heavy) | 15-20 kg over bar |
Programming takeaways for advanced athletes:
- Train odd objects 1-2x per week; more is too much
- Alternate heavy and moderate sessions
- Combine with carries, sled work, and barbell strength for full-spectrum development
- Chalk, belt, and technique are non-negotiable for heavy work
- Track time-to-complete and rep counts for progress markers
- odd object training every 4 weeks
- Progress by adding load, not — technique degrades fast at high volume
What's a key safety consideration for advanced odd object training that differs from barbells?
Sources
- • NSCA Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning (4th ed.)
- • Winwood et al. (2014) -- Strongman injury epidemiology
- • Zemke & Wright (2011) -- Strongman training review
- • NASM -- Strongman training principles